Feature tables contain jargon buyers cannot interpret. The useful response is a targeted correction with an observable acceptance check. That keeps the repair tied to the problem instead of turning it into an open-ended redesign.
Find the likely cause
Internal terminology has reached the purchasing interface.
Treat this as an explanation to verify against the actual work. Look at the input, the relevant decision, and the final result together. If the evidence does not support this diagnosis, investigate the mismatch before applying a convenient but unrelated fix.
Make the targeted correction
Translate features into understandable capabilities and limits.
A pricing page should make the offer's structure and relevant buying conditions understandable before a customer commits.
Check that the repair worked
Test the table with someone outside the product team.
Repeat the check on the final version that the reader or customer will encounter. An approved draft, a preview, and a published result can differ; the acceptance decision should concern the version people actually use.
Prevent the next related failure
A separate issue to watch for is this: the pricing page implies an unavailable package. Verify every listed option against the current approved offer.
Monitor the useful outcome
Track pricing-related questions, qualified purchase actions, and misunderstandings discovered after purchase.
Keep a short record of the original symptom, the evidence behind the diagnosis, and the result of the acceptance check. That record makes the solution reusable when the same condition appears again, without assuming that every superficially similar problem has the same cause.