An example works only under hidden assumptions. The useful response is a targeted correction with an observable acceptance check. That keeps the repair tied to the problem instead of turning it into an open-ended redesign.
Find the likely cause
Important conditions are left unstated.
Treat this as an explanation to verify against the actual work. Look at the input, the relevant decision, and the final result together. If the evidence does not support this diagnosis, investigate the mismatch before applying a convenient but unrelated fix.
Make the targeted correction
Specify the relevant audience, resources, and limits.
Examples make advice usable when they reveal how a decision changes under specific conditions.
Check that the repair worked
Explain when a different choice would be reasonable.
Repeat the check on the final version that the reader or customer will encounter. An approved draft, a preview, and a published result can differ; the acceptance decision should concern the version people actually use.
Prevent the next related failure
A separate issue to watch for is this: every example uses a huge company unlike the reader. Use situations matching the reader's scale and available resources.
Monitor the useful outcome
Evaluate whether readers can apply the principle to a new but related situation.
Keep a short record of the original symptom, the evidence behind the diagnosis, and the result of the acceptance check. That record makes the solution reusable when the same condition appears again, without assuming that every superficially similar problem has the same cause.