The symptom is specific: two articles answer the same question with minor wording differences. Start with the affected item and identify the decision or input that could produce this behavior.
Find the likely cause
The publishing plan treated keyword variants as separate needs.
Treat this as an explanation to verify against the actual work. Look at the input, the relevant decision, and the final result together. If the evidence does not support this diagnosis, investigate the mismatch before applying a convenient but unrelated fix.
Make the targeted correction
Choose a primary page and consolidate unique useful material where appropriate.
Overlapping pages deserve attention when they compete to satisfy the same task without offering meaningful differences.
Check that the repair worked
Ensure retained pages have distinct reader purposes.
Repeat the check on the final version that the reader or customer will encounter. An approved draft, a preview, and a published result can differ; the acceptance decision should concern the version people actually use.
Prevent the next related failure
A separate issue to watch for is this: the wrong page repeatedly attracts a target query. Clarify page scope and link relevant pages to the preferred resource.
Monitor the useful outcome
Track the clarity of page ownership and relevant query performance after changes settle.
Keep a short record of the original symptom, the evidence behind the diagnosis, and the result of the acceptance check. That record makes the solution reusable when the same condition appears again, without assuming that every superficially similar problem has the same cause.