When several pages have nearly identical titles, another broad rewrite or another batch of output may leave the underlying problem intact. Diagnose the relevant failure before changing the whole process.
Find the likely cause
Templates ignore the distinct purpose of each page.
Treat this as an explanation to verify against the actual work. Look at the input, the relevant decision, and the final result together. If the evidence does not support this diagnosis, investigate the mismatch before applying a convenient but unrelated fix.
Make the targeted correction
Include the specific task, product, or audience that differentiates the page.
A useful page title identifies the subject and distinguishes the page's specific value without promising unsupported results.
Check that the repair worked
Compare titles across the affected section as a list.
Repeat the check on the final version that the reader or customer will encounter. An approved draft, a preview, and a published result can differ; the acceptance decision should concern the version people actually use.
Prevent the next related failure
A separate issue to watch for is this: a title targets a topic the article barely covers. Either align the title with the existing content or substantively revise the article.
Monitor the useful outcome
Review query relevance and click behavior in context, including changes in position and audience mix.
Keep a short record of the original symptom, the evidence behind the diagnosis, and the result of the acceptance check. That record makes the solution reusable when the same condition appears again, without assuming that every superficially similar problem has the same cause.
Official reference for the platform or standard discussed: Google Search Central: title links.