The symptom is specific: aI campaign assets contradict each other. Start with the affected item and identify the decision or input that could produce this behavior.
Find the likely cause
Different prompts contain different offer details.
Treat this as an explanation to verify against the actual work. Look at the input, the relevant decision, and the final result together. If the evidence does not support this diagnosis, investigate the mismatch before applying a convenient but unrelated fix.
Make the targeted correction
Create one approved fact sheet and attach it to every asset request.
A campaign brief should make decisions easier by defining the audience, promise, evidence, action, and constraints.
Check that the repair worked
Compare dates, prices, eligibility, and calls to action across the full campaign.
Repeat the check on the final version that the reader or customer will encounter. An approved draft, a preview, and a published result can differ; the acceptance decision should concern the version people actually use.
Prevent the next related failure
A separate issue to watch for is this: the campaign brief is too vague to guide writers. Specify who should do what after seeing the asset.
Monitor the useful outcome
Track revision rounds and the percentage of deliverables accepted against the brief on first review.
Keep a short record of the original symptom, the evidence behind the diagnosis, and the result of the acceptance check. That record makes the solution reusable when the same condition appears again, without assuming that every superficially similar problem has the same cause.